More Mentor Texts (always)

I know, I haven't talked about why I love Giraffe Can't Dance.  Trust me, it's great.

Too many great books to talk about.

More wonderful work with classroom teachers and we’re continuing to talk about finding mentor texts–texts that are at the instructional level of the student, engaging, and include the ‘thing’ that you’re trying to teach the student about writing.   That’s a tall order so, naturally, teachers look for support.  There are a litany of books written for teachers about mentor texts, many of which are great, and publishing companies sell supplements to their textbooks that  include mentor texts, most of which are terrible.  All those books have a real challenge, though:  mentor texts need to arise organically from readers deeply engaging with reading and wanting to turn their writing into that type of thing they’re reading.  Just because a published author–or me–says that a books is a great mentor text doesn’t mean that it will work for any teacher in any classroom with any group of students.

That said, I want to help.  So I’ll offer a few picture books that I use as mentor texts.  Picturebooks are great because the text is often short, the pictures can support student comprehension, and the writing is usually phenomenal because very few words have to do a lot of work.  If you teach secondary students, the bonus of picture books is that they hearken back to a time when students liked reading and being read too (I didn’t spell it wrong, look!).  And, as long as you do it often and select high-quality ones, they won’t feel talked down to.

Below the fold: perspective, genre, ellipses, and lists.

Continue reading

Teaching in an election season like no other

As I head into planning for the fall, the question that I can’t get out of my head is this: How will I teach about the election this year? And the cascade of questions that follow: How will I prepare my students for being in schools in this election season? How do I give them the confidence to engage with students spouting rhetoric they heard on television?  What do I do if a student complains because I bring up the election?  What are my protections as a faculty member?  Do I have any?

Every other year when I’ve taught during an election, I use the historic moment as a teachable one: comparing education policies, examining rhetoric, critical reading of media coverage. The list of standards I could cover by digging into a political campaign was long. That hasn’t changed, necessarily, but this isn’t a normal election year.  Trump is a demagogue. The current president called him unfit for the office.  And both previous Republican presidents are remaining silent or offering criticism of the policies that Trump espouses, like isolationism and nativism.  His positions and rhetoric are not okay. But can I say that outloud in my classroom?

Continue reading

If we had forever

I said the words that serve as the title for this post earlier today as I was wrapping up a week-long writing workshop institute  with a group of about 30 teachers from Northeast ISD. That’s a fitting line for such an institute because, when you dive into writing, there’s so much that doesn’t get done.  Conversations that don’t happen, aren’t finished, or are cut short.  Conferences that don’t happen, aren’t finished, or are cut short.  And when you layer on the meta-conversations about teaching writing, there’s even more that just doesn’t get said.  So “if we had forever” is what I offered.  Because we’ll always need to cut things short with our students: the bell rings, the grades are due, the year ends.  Though we can always consider, “if we had forever…” and remember that, when we’re writing, we can get close.

Continue reading

Revision

Revision sucks.I’ve been told I’m odd because I find revision enjoyable.  Getting words on paper/screen is hard for me, but once something is written, I’ll tear into it.  I can tweak endlessly, rewrite entire paragraphs, reorganize at the last minute.  My co-authors valiantly put up with me and I’m quite grateful for their patience.

But convincing my students that revision is not just essential, but can be fun, is really tough.  And given the groan that rumbles across a room of teachers when you mention supporting kids doing revision, my students and I aren’t alone.  Two things have helped.  First, the concept of fusion.  Second, The Most Magnificent Thing (h/t to Michelle!).

Continue reading

Research on Writing to Learn

DictionaryAcademics care a lot about definitions.  And definitions matter.  And that’s a lot of what can turn folks off from academic writing.  Here’s a short example.

Writing to learn.  Seems simple enough, right?  Yes, and no.  For a lengthy discussion, I suggest this great resource from the Writing Across the Curriculum Clearinghouse.  A shorter discussion…

For some people, writing to learn supports students learning content and involves the type of writing that is a good fit for the class–probably a more formal, polished kind of writing.  By doing a writing assignment in, say, accounting, students can better learn accounting content, even though they aren’t running calculations in Excel.  For others,  writing to learn is informal, short writing that is done to capture thinking in the moment, often while students are in class. This writing could be a professor asking students to jot down ideas on an index card before class, and then using them to start a discussion.

Another way to think about the definition is that writing to learn is writing that happens as you’re thinking–through an idea, reading a text, watching a move, listening to a podcast, looking at a piece of art.  The audience for this writing is usually the writer, the purpose is to think, so the form/genre is whatever works.  Notebooks often hold writing to learn, but it could be a piece of paper scrounged from the bottom of a bag.  Sometimes this writing happens in class, or while doing homework for class.  Sometimes this writing happens as part of tasks that are a part of a writer’s life, like making a grocery list, or a pro-con list.  It’s writing that isn’t pretty, grammatically correct, or in sentences or paragraphs.  It can include drawing or sketches, post-it notes, quotes, or who knows what.  It is first-draft thinking so that, by the time you get to the writing that’s for other people in particular forms, the thinking has been refined.  If the length is any clue, this broad, wide-ranging understanding is where I stand.

But, no matter how to you define writing to think or writing to learn, there isn’t enough writing that supports learning going on in classrooms, either at the K-12 level, or at the college or university level.  So I was really excited to read a study that looked at writing to learn and found it had value in college classrooms.

Continue reading